Pediatric en bloc kidney transplantation to adult recipients: A case report
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Case Reports
VOLUME: 28 ISSUE: 4
P: 207 - 209
December 2012

Pediatric en bloc kidney transplantation to adult recipients: A case report

Turk J Surg 2012;28(4):207-209
1. Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, Diyarbakır, Türkiye
2. Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Çocuk Sağlığı ve Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Diyarbakır, Türkiye
No information available.
No information available
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

Kidney transplant is one of the most important treatment options in terminal phase kidney failure. The increase of patient waiting lists has pushed transplant centers towards using marginal donors. Although en bloc kidney transplant has been applied since 1970, technical complications, graft thrombosis and the worry of hyperfiltration damage has kept it limited in our country. Our aim in this study is to keep the en bloc kidney transplant on the agenda, which is done rarely from a child donor to an adult receiver.

Keywords:
Kidney transplantation, en bloc renal transplantation, adult recipients

References

1
Sharma A, Fisher RA, Cotterell AH, et al. En bloc kidney transplantation from pediatric donors: comparable outcomes with living donor kidney transplantation. Transplantation 2011; 92: 564-569. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ TP.0b013e3182279107 [CrossRef]
2
Baquero A, Ketel B, Himmel D, et al. Successful transplant outcomes using pediatric en bloc kidneys into adult recipients. Transplant Proc 2008; 40: 732-733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed. 2008.03.013 [CrossRef]
3
Merkel FK. Transplantation of small en bloc kidneys including a horseshoe kidney from donors aged 2 to 60 months to adult recipients: a 13-year experience. Transplant Proc 2001; 33: 3783-3784. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0041- 1345(01)02600-8 [CrossRef]
4
Mohanka R, Basu A, Shapiro R, et al. Single versus en bloc kidney transplantation from pediatric donors less than or equal to 15 kg. Transplantation 2008; 86: 264-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ TP.0b013e318177894e [CrossRef]
5
Pelletier SJ, Guidinger MK, Merion RM, et al. Recovery and utilization of deceased donor kidneys from small pediatric donors. Am J Transplant 2006; 6: 1646- 1652. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600- 6143.2006.01353.x [CrossRef]
6
Sureshkumar KK, Patel AA, Arora S, et al. When is it reasonable to split pediatric en bloc kidneys for transplantation into two adults? Transplant Proc 2010; 42: 3521-3523. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. transproceed.2010.08.038 [CrossRef]
7
Hiramoto JS, Freise CE, Randall HR, et al. Successful long-term outcomes using pediatric en bloc kidneys for transplantation. Am J Transplant 2002; 2: 337-342. http://dx.doi.org/10.1034/j.1600- 6143.2002.20408.x [CrossRef]
8
Lam VW, Laurence JM, Robertson P, et al. En bloc paediatric kidney transplant: is this the best use of a scarce resource? ANZ J Surg 2009; 79: 27-32. http://dx.doi. org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04793.x [CrossRef]
9
Ghazanfar A, Forgacs B, Campbell B, et al. Successful en bloc renal transplant from a 19-month-old nonheart-beating donor into an adult recipient: case report. Exp Clin Transplant 2011; 9: 60-62.
10
Modi P, Rizvi SJ, Trivedi HL. Successful en bloc transplantation of pediatric deceased donor kidneys with grade 1 injury. Indian J Nephrol 2009; 19: 167-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971- 4065.59341 [CrossRef]
11
Mali V, Robless P, Loh D, et al. Slower rate of compensatory hypertrophy in pediatric en bloc kidney transplantation in a pediatric recipient. Pediatr Transplant 2012; 16: 511-512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3046.2012.01665.x [CrossRef]
12
Dharnidharka VR, Stevens G, Howard RJ. En-bloc kidney transplantation in the United States: An analysis of united network of organ sharing (UNOS) data from 1987 to 2003. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 1513-1517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ j.1600-6143.2005.00878.x [CrossRef]
13
Bhayana S, Kuo YF, Madan P, et al. Pediatric en bloc kidney transplantation to adult recipients: more than suboptimal? Transplantation 2010; 90: 248-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ TP.0b013e3181e641f8 [CrossRef]